Historical Documents Index I Home I DVD Store I History E-Books I Video Guides I Customer Service I About Us
Lyndon B. Johnson’s Gulf of Tonkin Request to Congress

NOTE: Several years prior to this presidential request to Congress, the United States government was involved in assisting the South Vietnamese people in resisting attacks by communist Vietcong guerrillas. A reported attack on U.S. patrol ships in the Gulf of Tonkin (later disputed as a gross exaggeration) prompted President Johnson to ask Congress to issue the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, escalating the presence of U.S. troops in Vietnam. Though this was not a formal declaration of war (nor was there ever any), the resolution essentially marked the onset of a full-scale American war in Vietnam.
August 5, 1964
To the Congress of the United States:
Last night I announced to the American people that the North Vietnamese regime had
conducted further deliberate attacks against U.S. naval vessels operating in international
waters, and therefore directed air action against gunboats and supporting facilities
used in these hostile operations. This air action has now been carried out with
substantial damage to the boats and facilities. Two U.S. aircraft were lost in the
action.
After consultation with the leaders of both parties in the Congress, I further announced
a decision to ask the Congress for a resolution expressing the unity and determination
of the United States in supporting freedom and in protecting peace in southeast
Asia.
These latest actions of the North Vietnamese regime have given' a new and grave
turn to the already serious situation in southeast Asia. Our commitments in that
area are well known to the Congress. They were first made in 1954 by President Eisenhower.
They were further defined in the Southeast Asia Collective Defense Treaty approved
by the Senate in February 1955.
This treaty with its accompanying protocol obligates the United States and other
members to act in accordance with their constitutional processes to meet Communist
aggression against any of the parties or protocol states.
Our policy in southeast Asia has been consistent and unchanged since 1954. I summarized
it on June 2 in four simple propositions:
1. America keeps her word. Here as elsewhere, we must and shall honor our commitments.
2. The issue is the future of southeast Asia as a whole. A threat to any nation
in that region is a threat to all, and a threat to us.
3. Our purpose is peace.. We have no military, political, or territorial ambitions
in the area.
4. This is not just a jungle war, but a struggle for freedom on every front of human
activity. Our military and economic assistance to South Vietnam and Laos in particular
has the purpose of helping these countries to repel aggression and strengthen their
independence.
The threat to the three nations of southeast Asia has long been clear. The North
Vietnamese regime has constantly sought to take over South Vietnam and Laos. This
Communist regime has violated the Geneva accords for Vietnam. It has systematically
conducted a campaign of subversion, which includes the direction, training, and
supply of personnel and arms for the conduct of guerrilla warfare in South Vietnamese
territory. In Laos, the North Vietnamese regime has maintained military forces,
used Laotian territory for infiltration into South Vietnam, and most recently carried
out combat operations--all in direct violation of the Geneva agreements of 1962.
In recent months, the actions of the North Vietnamese regime have become steadily
more threatening. In May, following new acts of Communist aggression in Laos, the
United States undertook reconnaissance flights over Laotian territory, at the request
of the Government of Laos. These flights had the essential mission of determining
the situation in territory where Communist forces were preventing inspection by
the International Control Commission. When the Communists attacked these aircraft,
I responded by furnishing escort fighters with instructions to fire when fired upon.
Thus, these latest North Vietnamese attacks on our naval vessels are not the first
direct attack on armed forces of the United States.
As President of the United States I have concluded that I should now ask the Congress
on its part, to join in affirming the national determination that all such attack
swill be met, and that the United States will continue in its basic policy of assisting
the free nations of the area to defend their freedom.
As I have repeatedly made clear, the United States intends no rash-ness, and seeks
no wider war. We must make it clear to all that the United States is united in its
determination to bring about the end of Communist subversion and aggression in the
area. We seek the full and effective restoration of the international agreements
signed in Geneva in 1954, with respect to South Vietnam, and again in Geneva in
1962, with respect to Laos.
I recommend a resolution expressing the support of the Congress for all necessary
action to protect our Armed Forces and to assist nations covered by the SEATO Treaty.
At the same time, I assure the Congress that we shall continue readily to explore
any avenues of political solution that will effectively guarantee the removal of
Communist subversion and the preservation of the independence of the nations of
the area.
The resolution could well be based upon similar resolutions enacted by the Congress
in the past-to meet the threat to Formosa in 1955, to meet the threat to the Middle
East in 1957, and to meet the threat in Cuba in 1962. It could state in the simplest
terms the resolve and support of the Congress for action to deal appropriately with
attacks against our Armed Forces and to defend freedom and preserve peace in southeast
Asia in accordance with the obligations of the United States under the Southeast
Asia Treaty. I urge the Congress to enact such a resolution promptly and thus to
give convincing evidence to the aggressive Communist nations, and to the world as
a whole, that our policy in southeast Asia will be carried forward--and that the
peace and security of the area will be preserved.
The events of this week would in any event have made the passage of a congressional
resolution essential. But there is an additional reason for doing so at a time when
we are entering on 3 months of political campaigning. Hostile nations must understand
that in such a period the United States will continue to protect its national interests,
and that in these matters there is no division among us.
Historical Documents Index
I
Home
I
DVD Store I
History E-Books
I Video Guides
I Customer Service
I About Us